A structured engineering workspace for stretch versus recyclability trade-offs.
Product developers know elastane blends and water-repellent finishes block mechanical recycling, but no protocol exists to replace them without losing functional stretch or abrasion resistance.
Spec sheets catalog, they do not resolve
Static material records never propose a viable alternative construction.
Footprint scores arrive too late
LCA tools report after design completion, with no trade-off path forward.
Six-month iteration cycles
Each material swap restarts sampling, testing, and margin review from scratch.
Recycler intake tolerance is opaque
Fibre-to-fibre facilities reject blends without a documented intake rubric.
Translate stretch versus recyclability trade-offs into standard engineering contradiction matrices, then resolve them with matched inventive principles.
TRIZ principles indexed to fibre behaviour.
Validated constructions that hold the spec.
Ship a technical audit report that documents every trade-off decision, ready for mill negotiation and circularity review.
Fibre-to-fibre tolerance, documented.
Map stretch versus recyclability as a formal engineering contradiction. The canvas proposes inventive principles tuned to fibre behaviour, not generic problem-solving heuristics.
40 textile-specific inventive principles.
Fibre-to-fibre tolerance thresholds.
Validated alternatives that preserve functional stretch and abrasion resistance.
Technical report for mill negotiation.
Custom contradiction sets per season.
Trusted by teams at
2 weeks
Material iteration cycle
Down from six months per swap
40
Textile principles
Indexed to fibre behaviour
50+
SKUs per season
Where Resolvix pays for itself
Log the performance parameter you cannot lose against the property blocking recyclability. Resolvix formats it as a formal engineering contradiction.
Contradiction matrix resolving
The matrix returns ranked TRIZ principles indexed to fibre behaviour, each paired with a validated mono-material construction.
Principle card flipping to alternative
Ship a signed-off technical contradiction audit for mill negotiation and circularity review, documenting each trade-off decision.
Audit line drawing, stamp landing
Pilot thesis validation
4 900€
per year
Full development team
9 500€
per year
Multi-brand and lab access
Custom
annual agreement
Join the pilot cohort of materials engineers and technical development leads.
PLM catalogs static material specs. Resolvix actively proposes viable trade-off alternatives, matching inventive principles with mono-material constructions that hold the spec.
The principles database indexes common performance fibres and mechanically recyclable chemical finishes. Custom libraries extend coverage to your material set each quarter.
An automated PLM bill-of-materials plugin is on the roadmap. Pilot teams currently export the contradiction audit as a structured file for downstream tools.
The rubric encodes fibre-to-fibre recycler tolerance thresholds, so each recommendation is checked against real intake constraints before it reaches your team.
Pilot teams start with a thesis validation sprint against their own SKU set. We map your recurring contradictions and seed the library with your material constraints.
A structured engineering workspace for stretch versus recyclability trade-offs.
Product developers know elastane blends and water-repellent finishes block mechanical recycling, but no protocol exists to replace them without losing functional stretch or abrasion resistance.
Spec sheets catalog, they do not resolve
Static material records never propose a viable alternative construction.
Footprint scores arrive too late
LCA tools report after design completion, with no trade-off path forward.
Six-month iteration cycles
Each material swap restarts sampling, testing, and margin review from scratch.
Recycler intake tolerance is opaque
Fibre-to-fibre facilities reject blends without a documented intake rubric.
Translate stretch versus recyclability trade-offs into standard engineering contradiction matrices, then resolve them with matched inventive principles.
TRIZ principles indexed to fibre behaviour.
Validated constructions that hold the spec.
Ship a technical audit report that documents every trade-off decision, ready for mill negotiation and circularity review.
Fibre-to-fibre tolerance, documented.
Map stretch versus recyclability as a formal engineering contradiction. The canvas proposes inventive principles tuned to fibre behaviour, not generic problem-solving heuristics.
40 textile-specific inventive principles.
Fibre-to-fibre tolerance thresholds.
Validated alternatives that preserve functional stretch and abrasion resistance.
Technical report for mill negotiation.
Custom contradiction sets per season.
Trusted by teams at
2 weeks
Material iteration cycle
Down from six months per swap
40
Textile principles
Indexed to fibre behaviour
50+
SKUs per season
Where Resolvix pays for itself
Log the performance parameter you cannot lose against the property blocking recyclability. Resolvix formats it as a formal engineering contradiction.
Contradiction matrix resolving
The matrix returns ranked TRIZ principles indexed to fibre behaviour, each paired with a validated mono-material construction.
Principle card flipping to alternative
Ship a signed-off technical contradiction audit for mill negotiation and circularity review, documenting each trade-off decision.
Audit line drawing, stamp landing
Pilot thesis validation
4 900€
per year
Full development team
9 500€
per year
Multi-brand and lab access
Custom
annual agreement
Join the pilot cohort of materials engineers and technical development leads.
PLM catalogs static material specs. Resolvix actively proposes viable trade-off alternatives, matching inventive principles with mono-material constructions that hold the spec.
The principles database indexes common performance fibres and mechanically recyclable chemical finishes. Custom libraries extend coverage to your material set each quarter.
An automated PLM bill-of-materials plugin is on the roadmap. Pilot teams currently export the contradiction audit as a structured file for downstream tools.
The rubric encodes fibre-to-fibre recycler tolerance thresholds, so each recommendation is checked against real intake constraints before it reaches your team.
Pilot teams start with a thesis validation sprint against their own SKU set. We map your recurring contradictions and seed the library with your material constraints.